Inquire about Joining Our Network Professionals

  
Refer a Colleague
  

CME Peer Review delivers independent reviews of educational content that are structured, rigorous, and uncompromising. As a peer reviewer, the tools provided to me by CME Peer Review to support my reviews are outstanding. The computer assisted peer review process developed by CME Peer Review, including the detailed checklist and questionnaire instrument, ensures every review will be thorough and constructive, and that my comments will identify concerns in a fair and helpful manner.  The CME Peer Review team is exceptionally professional and while they have many outstanding qualities, one stands out in particular: speed.  The CME Peer Review team operates in an exceptionally time efficient manner to resolve any concern and to deliver the highest quality service in the industry.

Physician Reviewer
Associate Professor Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine
  

It's been a pleasure to provide services as a reviewer and auditor for CME Peer Review for the past several years. This is a critical service needed now more than ever. I enjoy the challenge and the responsibility to ensure the appropriate dissemination of medical knowledge. Particularly important is the double-layered structure of review that includes teams expert directors with primary reviewers. I've found that this level of detail and rigor provides a truly superior product. I'm sure there are probably simpler products available, but I would doubt the final product could be as finessed.

Physician Reviewer and Auditor
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension
  

I love working with CME Peer Review and feel that independent peer reviews help maintain the quality one should expect in a medical education today!

Physician Reviewer
Urologic Oncology
  

CME Peer Review: independent, knowledgeable, ethical.
The reviewers solicited to work with CME Peer Review are carefully selected for their abilities to understand and analyze well their areas of interest. They review in various modalities: on-site conferences, video/teleconferences, etc. They are anonymous when involved in the review process. The end user knows that the finished review will be in-depth, insightful, unbiased, and honest. The reviewers themselves feel a real sense of contributing to the improvement of the individual/group that they are evaluating. They also know that they are enhancing a well calibrated, well-conceived process when they are asked by CME Peer Review to participate.

The value of auditing/monitoring, on-site especially, is fulfilling for the reviewer who is exposed to the course learning, as is the rest of the course audience, but the reviewer also can get a real sense of how the audience feels about each presentation. So, the final review is not only the reviewer's own critique, but it contains a true sense of what the audience thinks of the speaker/course. From a reviewer's perspective, the pre-involvement instruction that CME Peer Review gives its reviewers, and the opportunity to review "live," makes CME Peer Review unique and exceptional.

Physician Auditor
Professor Obstetrics and Gynecology

Join Today

If you would like to become a member of our Medical Professional Network, and participate in a continuing education reviews, we invite you to complete our application form below.

Required Fields*