As a reviewer I feel I am making a useful contribution to postgraduate medical education by enhancing the clarity, balance and integrity of CME activities.
The CME Peer Review staff has been delight to work with, often accommodating their schedules to help me with queries on reviews on evenings and weekends that fit my needs but are no doubt inconvenient for the staff.
Providing peer reviews of CME content is valuable in many ways. I believe the most important contribution of this process is ensuring that the content meets the stated objectives without commercial bias. I believe that providing this feedback ultimately benefits the end user by producing content that is of higher quality.
The website interface makes intuitive sense and allows rapid and easy assimilation of the materials, creating an efficient review process.
The CME review process ensures that medical professionals receive high-quality and accurate continuing education.
Anonymous on-site auditing not only provides an important service in assuring impartiality of public CME presentations, it also often provides the auditor with an intellectually enriching experience.
CME Peer Review: independent, knowledgeable, ethical.
The reviewers solicited to work with CME Peer Review are carefully selected for their abilities to understand and analyze well their areas of interest. They review in various modalities: on-site conferences, video/teleconferences, etc. They are anonymous when involved in the review process. The end user knows that the finished review will be in-depth, insightful, unbiased, and honest. The reviewers themselves feel a real sense of contributing to the improvement of the individual/group that they are evaluating. They also know that they are enhancing a well calibrated, well-conceived process when they are asked by CME Peer Review to participate.
The value of auditing/monitoring, on-site especially, is fulfilling for the reviewer who is exposed to the course learning, as is the rest of the course audience, but the reviewer also can get a real sense of how the audience feels about each presentation. So, the final review is not only the reviewer's own critique, but it contains a true sense of what the audience thinks of the speaker/course. From a reviewer's perspective, the pre-involvement instruction that CME Peer Review gives its reviewers, and the opportunity to review "live," makes CME Peer Review unique and exceptional.
If you would like to become a member of our Medical Professional Network, and participate in a continuing education reviews, we invite you to complete our application form below.
Required Fields*